This paper studies adaptive targeting under network interference in a bandit setting, where treatments applied to one individual may affect others through spillover effects. We consider a linear model in a sparse regime, where each individual's outcome can be affected by at most a few others. We first establish a regret lower bound showing that ignoring the network structure and reducing the problem to a standard linear bandit inevitably leads to inefficient learning, particularly in large populations. To understand how structural information can be leveraged, we analyze regimes with varying levels of knowledge of the interference structure: (1) full support knowledge, (2) knowledge of the column support sizes, and (3) no prior knowledge. For each regime, we establish regret lower bounds characterizing the fundamental limits of learning, and develop algorithms that achieve near-optimal regret. Together, our results provide a unified view of how knowledge of the interference structure governs the efficiency of online learning under interference, and offer practical adaptive targeting algorithms in each setting. Numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world data demonstrate the practical benefits of our algorithms.

Probabilistic circuits (PCs) are a family of generative models which allows for the computation of exact likelihoods and marginals of its probability distributions. PCs are both expressive and tractable, and serve as popular choices for discrete density estimation tasks. However, large PCs are susceptible to overfitting, and only a few regularization strategies (e.g., dropout, weight-decay) have been explored. We propose HyperSPNs: a new paradigm of generating the mixture weights of large PCs using a small-scale neural network. Our framework can be viewed as a soft weight-sharing strategy, which combines the greater expressiveness of large models with the better generalization and memory-footprint properties of small models. We show the merits of our regularization strategy on two state-of-theart PC families introduced in recent literature - RAT-SPNs and EiNETs - and demonstrate generalization improvements in both models on a suite of density estimation benchmarks in both discrete and continuous domains.

For all authors... (a) Do the main claims made in the abstract and introduction accurately reflect the paper's contributions and scope? While MARL algorithms may be implemented for potentially harmful applications, we do not believe this work uniquely enables such applications. If you ran experiments... (a) Did you include the code, data, and instructions needed to reproduce the main experimental results (either in the supplemental material or as a URL)? [Yes] In the supplemental material (b) Did you specify all the training details (e.g., data splits, hyperparameters, how they were chosen)? If you used crowdsourcing or conducted research with human subjects... (a) Did you include the full text of instructions given to participants and screenshots, if applicable? [N/A] (b) Did you describe any potential participant risks, with links to Institutional Review Board (IRB) approvals, if applicable? [N/A] (c) Did you include the estimated hourly wage paid to participants and the total amount spent on participant compensation? Our allocation proposal network and Q network are illustrated in Figures 7 and 8. Low-level action utility functions and mixing networks are similar to those described in Iqbal et al. [10] with the only 13 difference being a replacement of the RNN layers with standard fully connected layers.

In many problems of data-driven modeling for dynamical systems, the governing equations are not known a priori and must be selected phenomenologically from a large set of candidate interactions and basis functions. In such situations, point estimates alone can be misleading, because multiple model components may explain the observed data comparably well, especially when the data are limited or the dynamics exhibit poor identifiability. Quantifying the uncertainty associated with model selection is therefore essential for constructing reliable dynamical models from data. In this work, we develop a Bayesian sparse identification framework for dynamical systems with coupled components, aimed at inferring both interaction structure and functional form together with principled uncertainty quantification. The proposed method combines sparse modeling with Bayesian model averaging, yielding posterior inclusion probabilities that quantify the credibility of each candidate interaction and basis component. Through numerical experiments on oscillator networks, we show that the framework accurately recovers sparse interaction structures with quantified uncertainty, including higher-order harmonic components, phase-lag effects, and multi-body interactions. We also demonstrate that, even in a phenomenological setting where the true governing equations are not contained in the assumed model class, the method can identify effective functional components with quantified uncertainty. These results highlight the importance of Bayesian uncertainty quantification in data-driven discovery of dynamical models.

We study the problem of synthesizing a number of likely future frames from a single input image. In contrast to traditional methods, which have tackled this problem in a deterministic or non-parametric way, we propose to model future frames in a probabilistic manner. Our probabilistic model makes it possible for us to sample and synthesize many possible future frames from a single input image. To synthesize realistic movement of objects, we propose a novel network structure, namely a Cross Convolutional Network; this network encodes image and motion information as feature maps and convolutional kernels, respectively. In experiments, our model performs well on synthetic data, such as 2D shapes and animated game sprites, as well as on real-world video frames. We also show that our model can be applied to visual analogy-making, and present an analysis of the learned network representations.